Research-led
Public content identifies its evidence type, source, review status and important limitations.
HAW exists because access to health information is not the same as being able to judge it, question it and use it safely. Research, practical tools, professional learning and community knowledge are brought together in one connected platform.

Public content identifies its evidence type, source, review status and important limitations.
HAW treats trust, language, power, lived experience and context as central to health-information use.
Evidence is translated into practical learning, appraisal tools and community-informed resources.
People can be surrounded by health content and still lack a fair chance to decide what is credible, relevant or uncertain, and what action is safe.
Search engines, social feeds, advertising, professional authority, family networks, language barriers and previous experiences all influence how information is interpreted.
HAW provides a clear environment where research, practical appraisal tools, learning and community knowledge work together rather than sitting in separate silos.
HAW communicates in a direct, calm and transparent way. It does not dramatise risk, overstate certainty or blame people for finding complex information difficult.
Evidence, public guidance, expert interpretation, community knowledge and teaching examples are clearly distinguished so that users can understand the basis of a claim.
The public website explains the mission, evidence standards, tools, research and community work.
HAW Academy provides protected professional learning, course creation, evidence review, accessibility review and role-based administration through the same trusted identity system.
Themes, studies, evidence summaries and transparent interpretation.
Structured professional learning with accessible lessons and governed review.
Practical prompts and workflows for appraising health information.
Co-designed work grounded in context, trust and reciprocal benefit.
These sources make the evidence basis visible and help readers review the guidance, standards and research informing this page.
World Health Organization
Frames health literacy as a personal and organisational capability shaped by social, economic and communication conditions.
View sourceWorld Health Organization
Supports HAW's focus on misinformation resilience, information voids, trust and credible health communication.
View sourceW3C
Sets the accessibility benchmark used for HAW interface, content and interaction design.
View sourceNHS England
Supports clear information and communication support needs, especially for disabled people and people with sensory loss.
View sourceStart with the research themes and see how they connect to learning, tools and community work.